Sunday, November 29, 2015

Justice David Frankel, Freemasonry and the Department of Justice

Justice David Frankel
When Josef Rudolf encountered what appeared to be sharp practice and trickery by Vancouver Department of Justice lawyer, Jason Levine, he contacted friends in the vigilante movement in British Columbia who keep an eye on the corruption in the courts and who informed him that the Department of Justice in Vancouver was heavily infiltrated by Freemasons.

One of the suspected Freemasons is Justice David Frankel who was a career lawyer with the Department of Justice, in Vancouver, and who recently ruled against a litigant who applied for access to internal court documents that would prove a criminal conspiracy by several Vancouver based judges who are Freemasons.

Normally, court records are open to the public and secrecy is allowed to protect litigants or witnesses identity who need protection and not to protect the identity of judges who fix cases so it is probable that that Justice David Frankel was put on the case and broke his judicial oath in order to protect a group of judicial criminals and lawyers.

The vigilantes also informed Josef Rudolf that, according to various sources, there was a network of lawyers and judges in the Provincial Government operated criminal prosecution service and Federal Department of Justice that were heavy drug users (i.e. crack cocaine), involved in some very kinky sex and under the control of various criminal organizations that operate in the Vancouver criminal underworld. 

A few years ago, these vigilantes brought to public attention a number of cases where certain judges were involved in the criminal sex abuse of young children, as young as six,  and it is believed that at least one of the judges involved committed suicide instead of undergoing a criminal investigation.  

Click here to read about the pedofile judge whose career was terminated by the work of the British Columbia Vigilantes 

It was pointed out to Josef Rudolf that these lawyers and judges were completely owned by organized crime so he could not expect a fair hearing if a group of criminals was secretly profiting from the sale of his property a sale that Canada Revenue Agency refuses to provide any evidence of where the money went.

The fact that Canada Revenue Agency refuses to provide the evidence proves that the money did not go to the taxpayers of Canada and instead was paid out to criminals.