tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1910743271161512302024-03-05T12:55:59.131-08:00The Josef Rudolf Story - Is Canada Revenue Agency a Criminal Organization? Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11745256773069003209noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-191074327116151230.post-68543432496251115632015-11-29T09:37:00.002-08:002015-11-30T12:01:25.542-08:00Justice David Frankel, Freemasonry and the Department of Justice <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEipgUUUpwdhUBurf0JgHmXe-EKE8bSr1xFLQExTwPgI_1bIuLaq9j1Jus4c-yO46EaG5Jvx0gw3EPTUkAP-zlKa1dY-WSbmPrJ-TMVyw2g6UCgf2d0D-z5Dglf77L9MMIaXKRvSAYyIir0/s1600/david_frankel%255B1%255D.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEipgUUUpwdhUBurf0JgHmXe-EKE8bSr1xFLQExTwPgI_1bIuLaq9j1Jus4c-yO46EaG5Jvx0gw3EPTUkAP-zlKa1dY-WSbmPrJ-TMVyw2g6UCgf2d0D-z5Dglf77L9MMIaXKRvSAYyIir0/s1600/david_frankel%255B1%255D.jpg" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: large;">Justice David Frankel</span></td></tr>
</tbody></table>
When <strong>Josef Rudolf</strong> encountered what appeared to be sharp practice and trickery by <strong>Vancouver</strong> <strong>Department of Justice</strong> lawyer, <strong>Jason Levine</strong>, he contacted friends in the vigilante movement in <strong>British Columbia</strong> who keep an eye on the corruption in the courts and who informed him that the <strong>Department of Justice in Vancouver</strong> was heavily infiltrated by<strong> Freemasons</strong>. <br />
<br />
One of the suspected <strong>Freemasons</strong> is <strong>Justice David Frankel </strong>who was a career lawyer with the <strong>Department of Justice,</strong> in <strong>Vancouver,</strong> and who recently ruled against a litigant who applied for access to internal court documents that would prove a criminal conspiracy by several<strong> Vancouver</strong> based judges who are <strong>Freemasons.</strong> <br />
<br />
Normally, court records are open to the public and secrecy is allowed to protect litigants or witnesses identity who need protection and not to protect the identity of judges who fix cases so it is probable that that <strong>Justice David Frankel</strong> was put on the case and broke his judicial oath in order to protect a group of judicial criminals and lawyers.<br />
<br />
The vigilantes also informed <strong>Josef Rudolf</strong> that, according to various sources, there was a network of lawyers and judges in the <strong>Provincial Government</strong> operated criminal prosecution service and<strong> Federal Department of Justice</strong> that were heavy drug users (i.e. crack cocaine), involved in some very kinky sex and under the control of various criminal organizations that operate in the <strong>Vancouver </strong>criminal underworld. <br />
<br />
A few years ago, these vigilantes brought to public attention a number of cases where certain judges were involved in the criminal sex abuse of young children, as young as six, and it is believed that at least one of the judges involved committed suicide instead of undergoing a criminal investigation. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.waterwarcrimes.com/6-chief-judge-hugh-stansfield---provincial-court-of-british-columbia---suspected-pedofile---suspected-murder-victim.html">Click here to read about the pedofile judge whose career was terminated by the work of the British Columbia Vigilantes</a> <br />
<br />
It was pointed out to <strong>Josef Rudolf</strong> that these lawyers and judges were completely owned by organized crime so he could not expect a fair hearing if a group of criminals was secretly profiting from the sale of his property a sale that <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> refuses to provide any evidence of where the money went.<br />
<br />
The fact that <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> refuses to provide the evidence proves that the money did not go to the taxpayers of <strong>Canada </strong>and instead was paid out to criminals.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11745256773069003209noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-191074327116151230.post-46479106709447956002015-09-24T07:23:00.003-07:002016-02-23T12:53:51.728-08:00More Evidence of Criminal Corruption Inside Vancouver Department of Justice and British Columbia Courts Vindicates Josef Rudolf <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi67zgyELSvk4HoH2ptWioAoMaCc3-fczpEn7UsWL0UY_QEhzPC1pFiUHcWytf3JlkI5Xfvy0x8kdfvqJYgDAgsbqByri1BQzJ-Ih4IbaiQUZ4Le3tSVG7xSPxWMLZSVNbDa3TEHc9Mnhk/s1600/Judd%252520Levine-%25252018%255B1%255D.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="213" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi67zgyELSvk4HoH2ptWioAoMaCc3-fczpEn7UsWL0UY_QEhzPC1pFiUHcWytf3JlkI5Xfvy0x8kdfvqJYgDAgsbqByri1BQzJ-Ih4IbaiQUZ4Le3tSVG7xSPxWMLZSVNbDa3TEHc9Mnhk/s320/Judd%252520Levine-%25252018%255B1%255D.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><strong>FREEMASON JASON LEVINE ON RIGHT</strong> </td></tr>
</tbody></table>
When <strong>Vancouver Department of Justice</strong> lawyer and <strong>Freemason</strong>, <strong>Jason Levine</strong>, artfully moved the questionable certificate of taxes owing that <strong>Joself Rudolf</strong> was fighting in the <strong>Federal Court</strong> over to the <strong>British Columbia</strong> <strong>Supreme Court</strong> <strong>Levine</strong> effectively denied access to justice to <strong>Josef Rudolf</strong>. contrary to the <strong>Magna Carta</strong> and many other <strong>Canadian</strong> laws. <br />
<br />
The certificate of taxes owing is called officially called a judgment but it is not a judgment because it was not made by a judge. There was no trial. It was simply a filing by a stupid mindless bureaucrat paid to harass taxpayers who estimated that <strong>Josef Rudolf</strong> owed some money to the government for unpaid taxes.<br />
<br />
The problem for<strong> Josef</strong> is that he is a<strong> Catholic</strong> and the <strong>Supreme Court of British Columbia</strong> is filled with <strong>Freemasons</strong> who hate <strong>Catholics </strong>and especially a devout believing<strong> Catholic </strong>like<strong> Josef Rudolf.</strong><br />
<br />
<table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: right;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj60jeSaPjFy98CliBJnblZx4a9phaD2VxxDByg77aL7s8_lpUx9KfTivudOt4MUcVthNvaMbsclctpERis9SyAa18Qc53LkuKR-hvNVccBQs0XE7PvHQNRvkyGTz0dwJX03OBWJMa1c5k/s1600/hinkson%255B1%255D.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="200" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEj60jeSaPjFy98CliBJnblZx4a9phaD2VxxDByg77aL7s8_lpUx9KfTivudOt4MUcVthNvaMbsclctpERis9SyAa18Qc53LkuKR-hvNVccBQs0XE7PvHQNRvkyGTz0dwJX03OBWJMa1c5k/s200/hinkson%255B1%255D.png" width="200" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;"><span style="font-size: small;"><strong>Freemason Chief Justice</strong></span> </td></tr>
</tbody></table>
The <strong>Freemason </strong>controlled<strong> Supreme Court of British Columbia took Josef's</strong> real estate, sold it at a court sale and was supposed to pay the money to the<strong> Department of Justice </strong>to be applied against Josef's so-called tax debt. <br />
<br />
The problem is that no matter what he does or who he asks, the <strong>Department of Justice,</strong> <strong>Canada Revenue</strong> and the <strong>British Columbia Supreme Court</strong> all refuse to show where the money went.<br />
<br />
If the money did not go to <strong>Canada Revenue</strong> then it was stolen and the reason no one will account for it is that someone must go to jail and that someone is probably a <strong>Freemason.</strong> <br />
<br />
As we continue to publish the role of the criminal organization known as Freemasonry on this blog and others more and more people are coming forward and telling their stories and letting us know which judges and lawyers are <strong>Freemasons </strong>and recently we received information from a third party that the<strong> CHIEF JUSTICE</strong> of the <strong>Supreme Court Of British Columbia</strong>, <strong>Christopher Hinkson</strong> is a Freemason.<br />
<br />
In <strong>Canada, Freemasonry</strong> is actually a<u> criminal organization</u> for two very important reasons <br />
<br />
1. <strong>Freemason</strong> members use signals, gestures, and code words and code phrases in court proceedings in order to secretly communicate with a judge for the purpose of influencing the outcome of a hearing or trial. As a result innocent people are sent to jail or fined in criminal proceedings or are deprived of equal justice in civil proceedings. <strong><a href="http://freemasonry.bcy.ca/"><span style="color: #992211;">British Columbia Freemasonry</span></a></strong> has a notorious reputation for such shenanigans.<br />
<br />
2. <strong>Freemasons</strong> in <strong>Canada </strong>do not comply with the mandatory reporting provisions of the <a href="http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/acts/unlawful-societies-act-1799"><strong><span style="color: #992211;">Unlawful Societies Act</span></strong><span style="color: #992211;"> </span></a>that was passed by the<strong> English Parliament</strong> in 1799 and that is still part of the law in Canada and can only be repealed by an Act of the Canadian Parliament as a result of the <strong>Statute of Westminster</strong> passed by the English Parliament in 1932. The penalty for non-compliance with the <strong>Unlawful Societies Act</strong> is 7 years imprisonment. <br />
<br />
The <strong>Unlawful Societies Act of 1799</strong> was passed after the <strong>English</strong> ruling classes watched the debacles of losing their colonies in the successful <strong>American</strong> rebellion led by <strong>Freemasons </strong><strong>George Washington</strong> and <strong>Benjamin Franklin</strong> and after watching the merciless slaughter of their cousins among the <strong>French </strong>ruling classes by the successful <strong>French</strong> rebellion that was also led by prominent <strong>Freemasons. </strong><br />
<strong></strong><br />
<strong>American and French Freemasonry</strong> had a legitimate purpose in the establishment of republican forms of government in those countries. <br />
<br />
<strong>Canadian Freemasonry</strong> is a dangerous criminal organization.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11745256773069003209noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-191074327116151230.post-28375562558741062642013-09-28T08:00:00.000-07:002015-09-20T13:25:45.113-07:00Mafia Infiltrates Canada Revenue AgencyThe <strong>Canadian </strong>media is vindicating<strong> Josef Rudolf</strong> with new information that the Italian Mafia has infiltrated the <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> in<strong> Montreal</strong> where dirty insiders <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> mailed a <strong>$381,737</strong> cheque to <strong>Mafia don Nicolo Rizzuto</strong>.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/tax-refund-mystery-is-latest-of-montreal-crime-familys-many-links-to-officialdom/article14548776/">Click here for more on Mafia infiltration of CRA</a><br />
<br />
However, the racist<strong> English</strong> language media in<strong> Canada</strong> is refusing to publish equally lurid stories about organized crime infiltration of the <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> in the <strong>English </strong>speaking city of <strong>Vancouver</strong> where a <strong>Freemason</strong> based organized crime group has infiltrated the <strong>Department of Justice</strong> and refuses to account for the funds looted from <strong>Josef Rudolf</strong>.<br />
<br />
<strong>Freemasonry</strong> in <strong>Canada </strong>is an international organized criminal syndicate headquartered in <strong>London</strong> <strong>England</strong> with links to dirty upper class families who looted the farms from<strong> English</strong> peasants. <strong>English Freemasonry</strong> it is well known in<strong> English</strong> speaking countries to be involved in judicial, legal and police corruption as a result of years of unchecked infiltration of these government agencies.<br />
<br />
<strong>Freemasonry</strong> in <strong>Canada</strong> should not be confused with <strong>American Freemasonry</strong> which is headquartered in the<strong> United States</strong>.<strong> Freemasonry</strong> in the <strong>United States</strong> played a historic role in the <strong>American Revolution</strong> against<strong> England</strong> while <strong>Freemasonry</strong> in <strong>Canada</strong> has subverted the independence of <strong>Canada</strong>, secretly, since the country was established as a self governing dominion within the <strong>British Empire</strong> in 1867. <br />
<br />
<strong>Canada's</strong> first <strong>Prime Minister John MacDonald</strong> was a <strong>Freemason</strong> as were <strong>Robert Borden</strong> who introduced Income Tax during World War 1, <strong>Mackenzie King</strong> who illegally re-introduced Income Tax in Canada in 1948 and <strong>Brian Mulroney</strong> who illegally introduced the widely despised GST, Goods and Services Tax in 1992. Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11745256773069003209noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-191074327116151230.post-61368353117716501132013-06-22T05:15:00.002-07:002013-07-30T06:53:48.146-07:00Is Kirat Khalsa a dishonest lawyer? The Josef Rudolf case starts to get really nasty. <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left; margin-right: 1em; text-align: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhzldweovbWH7R1N3Uf49J4-7UfxWsTuklP1srwhp5m0IS2PPYLQKmDkpxx0ZTWdOids64c5o1xCtySrzgQcCbwA85oRBkFKnfjYKn9ZLhsCq7NmrSy3SUpEfdt4IuQBECckLtU2XBlelo/s1600/PROUDLY+KHALSA%5B1%5D.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhzldweovbWH7R1N3Uf49J4-7UfxWsTuklP1srwhp5m0IS2PPYLQKmDkpxx0ZTWdOids64c5o1xCtySrzgQcCbwA85oRBkFKnfjYKn9ZLhsCq7NmrSy3SUpEfdt4IuQBECckLtU2XBlelo/s320/PROUDLY+KHALSA%5B1%5D.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">A Real Khalsa Doesn't Cheat </td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<strong>Josef Rudolf</strong> is having a difficult time with <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> lawyer <strong>Kirat Khalsa</strong> in <strong>Canada's Federal Court</strong> because <strong>Ms. Khalsa</strong>, in our opinion, has resorted to<em><strong><u> dirty tricks</u></strong></em>.<br />
<br />
<em><strong><u>Dirty Tricks</u></strong></em> are sneaky, often dishonest, things that lawyers do so they can win a case in an underhanded and unfair way. It is kind of like punching below the belt in boxing, tripping and hooking in hockey, and chemical weapons in warfare. It is illegal but, if you get away with it, then you, as a lawyer, win your case but as a human being, you sell a piece of your soul and degrade yourself.<br />
<br />
For example, lawyers will often write you a letter and not sign it. This way they cannot be blamed for the dishonest words on the unsigned piece of paper that often mislead the recipient. This is one of the dirty tricks that dishonest lawyers use. <br />
<br />
In <strong>Josef Rudolf's</strong> case, <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> was required to serve "Affidavits" in response to<strong> Josef Rudolf's</strong> initiating documents. <strong>Josef Rudolf</strong>, under the rules of court, was then entitled to cross-examine the person who swore the affidavit to be true. Cross-examination of the "deponent" of an affidavit (i.e. the persons who swears it to be true) is an important part of the judicial process to ensure so that the parties are given the opportunity of a fair hearing.<br />
<br />
However, in<strong> Josef Rudolf's</strong> case,<strong> Kirat Khalsa</strong>, as legal counsel for <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> and other Respondents in <strong>Josef Rudolf's</strong> case, did not serve "sworn" Affidavits upon <strong>Josef Rudolf</strong>. Instead she sent him an unsworn "Affidaivt" which is not really Affidavit at all but is simply a few pages of paper with words on them that cannot be attributed to anyone. In our opinion, by using this dirty trick, <strong>Kirat Khalsa </strong>craftily denied<strong> Josef Rudolf</strong> the opportunity to cross-examine the deponent of the Affidavit and, in the result, he was denied a fair hearing of his <strong>Petition </strong>in <strong>Canada's Federal Court.</strong><br />
<br />
Later, when the case went to court, <strong>Kirat Khalsa</strong> used the sworn Affidavit and<strong> Judge Simon Noel</strong> let it be used in court over the objections of <strong>Josef Rudolf</strong>. This was unfair also. <br />
<br />
When <strong>Josef Rudolf</strong> appealed the decision of the lower court judge to <strong>Canada's Federal Court of Appeal, </strong>he objected to the inclusion of the sworn Affidavit in the Appeal Book because, in his opinion, it was not properly before the lower court and was not served upon him in the proper way thereby denying him a fair hearing of his Petition.<br />
<br />
<strong>Federal Court of Appeal</strong> judge,<strong> Eleanor Dawson</strong>, ruled that the sworn Affidavit should be in the appeal book.<br />
<br />
So, <strong>Josef Rudolf</strong> appealed the decision of judge<strong> Eleanor Dawson</strong> based on the fact that in his opinion, the Order of <strong>Eleanor Dawson</strong> had been obtained by fraud. <br />
<br />
Rule 399 (2) (b) states <br />
<br />
<em><strong>On motion, the Court may set aside or vary an order</strong></em><br />
<ul class="ProvisionList">
<li><div class="Paragraph">
<em><strong>(b) where the order was obtained by fraud</strong></em>.</div>
</li>
</ul>
<div class="Paragraph">
This could get very nasty for <strong>Kirat Khalsa</strong> because, if the court finds she committed fraud, then she could, in theory, lose her licence to practise law. We say "in theory" she could lose her licence because the professional body in <strong>British Columbia</strong> that supervises these kinds of things is the<strong> Law Society of British Columbia</strong> an organization riddled with corruption and with a notorious reputation for protecting government employed lawyers despite clear proof of their dishonesty. <br />
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgufahq__fP2CDRTjYrSOw1j2G78isxs-0r5W16AuPKmy038f84JHdmf2py2lOxC4vQuWycxSKcv-e6SUgSFtxDUNhvwa6yffycvVy-8bPM47uTBgSIRM8Pw5z2z7voj8JUy7RIfZ5IsJg/s1600/pentney%5B1%5D.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgufahq__fP2CDRTjYrSOw1j2G78isxs-0r5W16AuPKmy038f84JHdmf2py2lOxC4vQuWycxSKcv-e6SUgSFtxDUNhvwa6yffycvVy-8bPM47uTBgSIRM8Pw5z2z7voj8JUy7RIfZ5IsJg/s1600/pentney%5B1%5D.jpg" /></a><br />
<strong></strong><br />
<strong>Josef Rudolf</strong> is claiming that<strong> Kirat Khalsa</strong>, (no photo available) a lawyer with <strong>Canada's Department of J</strong>ustice in <strong>Vancouver,</strong> and <strong>William Pentney</strong>, (shown in photo on right) the <strong>Canadian Deputy Minister of Justice</strong>, in<strong> Ottawa</strong>, are both involved in this because<strong> William Pentney's</strong> name appears on the court documents and he establishes the legal culture in the <strong>Department of Justice</strong>.<br />
<br />
If lawyers working for the <strong>Department of Justice</strong> cheat, use dirty tricks and get away with it, then <strong>William Pentney</strong> is not doing his job properly and he should be fired. </div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11745256773069003209noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-191074327116151230.post-82548020511521122922013-02-22T11:19:00.004-08:002013-02-25T21:04:12.681-08:00Federal Court Justice Noel and Freemasonry in Canada <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjsNBBCMObXsRinfhlNwoN2NvleCpB0y-346vq-owf7MlPhQ7QSd7Vn2b54_IjPYIXqRyKrrb2lQGjhmQLqUKgA1zs3HEPNTqvL8WK0WRKsMDDPT07fdPYD0Sp9IaD4FwBiG7NtMRyEWiI/s1600/Noel%5B1%5D.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjsNBBCMObXsRinfhlNwoN2NvleCpB0y-346vq-owf7MlPhQ7QSd7Vn2b54_IjPYIXqRyKrrb2lQGjhmQLqUKgA1zs3HEPNTqvL8WK0WRKsMDDPT07fdPYD0Sp9IaD4FwBiG7NtMRyEWiI/s320/Noel%5B1%5D.gif" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Justice Simon Noel Denies He Is A Freemason</td></tr>
</tbody></table>
<strong>Canadian Federal Court Justice Simon Noel</strong> broke new legal ground in<strong> British Columbia</strong> yesterday, when, after being qestionned by litigant <strong>Josef Rudlof,</strong> he stated<em><strong> "I can assure you that I am not a Freemason".</strong></em><br />
<br />
<strong>Rudolf</strong> posed the question because he alleges that a group of<strong> Freemason</strong> lawyers and judges in Bri<strong>tish Columbia</strong> conspired to loot his property in defiance of the laws of <strong>God</strong> and <strong>Canada</strong>. <br />
<br />
In other cases in the courts of <strong>British Columbia</strong>, judges have consistently refused to disclose whether or not they are <strong>Freemasons</strong>. <br />
<br />
The question is very legitimate because under the <strong>Unlawful Societies Act,</strong> a <strong>1799 Statute of England</strong> that remains in force in <strong>Canada</strong>, <strong>Freemasons</strong> are required to report their members and what is taking place at thei meetings to the <strong>Chief Magistrate</strong> and it is a felony offence not to comply. Furthermore, <strong>Freemason</strong>s in <strong>British Columbia</strong> are notoriously well known as a criminal organization that rigs and fixes the outcome of law cases to benefit their brothers. <br />
<br />
Of course, since <strong>Justice Noel</strong> is not a<strong> Freeemason</strong> he had nothing to hide and he was willing to answer the queston, unlike other judges who are <strong>Freemasons</strong> who will not answer because to do so would reveal their criminal network in all its perverse glory. <br />
<br />
<strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> lawyer,<strong> Kirat Khalsa</strong>, presumably on instructions from members of the <strong>Freemason</strong> cabal inside the <strong>Department of Justice</strong>, argued that such questions of judges and lawyers were inappropriate. Nonetheless, <strong>Justice Simon Noel</strong>, did the right thing and his leadership on this issue may lead to futher disclosures that will assist to remove the <strong>Freemason</strong> cabal from <strong>Canada's</strong> legal and justice systems. Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11745256773069003209noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-191074327116151230.post-68993982379020470142013-02-18T21:59:00.000-08:002013-04-16T14:49:56.883-07:00Is Canada's Income Tax law a Scam run by an International Banking cartel? <div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiTqIxoRSGIasYx-MsCaThxnfbG7dUK6dvNBCc89Ta0FuuzBcsdrUIbHyzBnyc9pOXx8c6tug5B5w9klzerKs3M4hAc8zHhHA-1h92yjhDdbWjRLRx5HA3soc9lv3aZkIDJIG2nbnyGB78/s1600/Canada+Revenue+Agency.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiTqIxoRSGIasYx-MsCaThxnfbG7dUK6dvNBCc89Ta0FuuzBcsdrUIbHyzBnyc9pOXx8c6tug5B5w9klzerKs3M4hAc8zHhHA-1h92yjhDdbWjRLRx5HA3soc9lv3aZkIDJIG2nbnyGB78/s320/Canada+Revenue+Agency.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
<span style="font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="color: black;">From the time he came to <strong>Canada</strong> in the 1970`s, <strong>Josef Rudolf</strong> dutifully paid <strong>Income Taxes,</strong> without questioning the process, but, in </span><span style="line-height: 115%;">1993, he</span><span style="line-height: 115%;"> started working as proprietor doing forestry work, such as road layout, timber cruising, development plans, etc.</span></span><br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Every year, he calculated his taxes and completed his income tax forms by himself until he was told that one can get better return if it is done by a certified accountant. </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"></span></span> </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"><span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 115%;">However, he found that if he took the same pile of papers to
different accountants he got quite different figures and when he recalculated the accountant’s work, most of the time, there were big mistakes that resulted in him paying more taxes that necessary. </span>Obviously, something was not right.<span style="line-height: 115%;"> </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span style="font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"></span> </div>
<span style="font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="line-height: 115%;">So, he questioned if the accountants knew what
they were doing.</span></span><br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">In 1995, Mr. Rudolf met a Canadian gentleman who explained to him that <b>Income Tax</b> is a scam / a fraud and that <b>Canada Revenue Agency </b>was a private company run by an <b>International Banking Cartel. </b>He was also advised that there is no law
that compels </span>anyone to pay income taxes. </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"></span></span> </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;">He was told that section 91:10 of <b>Tax
Operational Manual</b> states <i>“Income tax is voluntary compliance</i>”.</span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"></span></span> </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="line-height: 115%;"><span style="font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;">He was further told that the <b>Income Tax
Act</b> is a mess, it was newer properly enacted and that nobody understood it</span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%;">. <o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%;">It
took<b> Josef Rudolf</b> a while to believe this explanation. He did intensive research and questioned people
who worked for <b>Revenue</b> <b>Canada</b> and asked them if income tax was unlawful and people who worked for Revenue Canada answered "yes" that it was unlawful</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%;"></span> </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%;">He also went to the Revenue Canada Agency office in<b> Kelowna, British Columbia,</b> and found Section 91:10 of <b>Tax Operational Manual</b> and it did state that income tax operated under a system of voluntary compliance. </span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%;"></span> </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%;">He then read several books about Income Tax and could not make head nor tail of at all and when he asked an older gentleman who was helping me
about it he just shook his head and waved his hand.<o:p></o:p></span><br />
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%;"></span> </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<b>Canada Revenue Agency</b> <span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%;">approached him by letters and telephone and an employee, <b>Mr. Mike LeBlanc, </b>came to his home and threatened him. <strong>LeBlanc's </strong>conduct was consistent with that of other employees of<b> Canada Revenue Agency</b> who were almost always threatening and rude. They never answered his questions. <b>Agent Mike LeBlanc </b>was very jumpy and loud and told <strong>Rudolf </strong>that if he wanted they would burn his house down. </span><br />
<span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%;"><br /></span>
So, <strong>Josef Rudolf</strong> continued to ask questions directly to <strong>Canada Reveune Agency</strong> about how to properly calculate his taxes owing but the <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> would not answer his questions and, in 1999,<strong> Canada Revenue Agency</strong> retaliated against him by bringing a criminal charges for failing to file a tax return after <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> failed to answer some basic questions.<br />
<br />
The case carried on for 19 months and <strong>Josef Rudolf</strong> made 23 appearances in court asking for full disclosure and information about how to calcualte the taxes owing but <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> never produced the information requested and, in 2004, the charges against him were "stayed" by the local <strong>Crown Prosecutor</strong>.</div>
<br />
Because <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> employees has lied during the criminal proceedings, <strong>Josef Rudolf</strong> brought criminal charges against the liars in the <strong>Provincial Court of British Columbia</strong> but the <strong>Attorney General</strong> intervened and asked the judge to order a stay of proceedings which the judge did. Although <strong>Canada's</strong> judges are technically independent of government, in practice, they do exactly what the government wishes.<br />
<br />
<strong>Josef Rudolf</strong> then brought the same criminal charges against the same employees of the <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> in the <strong>Supreme Court of British Columbia</strong> where the judges work for a different <strong>Attorney</strong> <strong>General </strong>but, again, the <strong>Attorney General</strong> intervened and asked the judge to order a stay of proceedings which the judge did. <br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;">During the course of the hearing.<strong> Judge Takahashi</strong> said<i> </i><span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%;"><i> “I read Income Tax twice and I do not understand it either”.</i> Later, when <strong>Mr. Rudolf</strong> got a transcript of the hearing the words were changed to <em>“I read the Income Tax Act and find it rather
vague”.</em> The changing of a court record is a common practice by judges in Canada. </span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Times, Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%;"><i><br /></i></span></span>
<b>Editors note:</b> The reader is reminded that the comments on this blog are the political opinions of the Editors or<b> Josef Rudolf</b> and the reader is encouraged to obtain independent lawful legal advice.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11745256773069003209noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-191074327116151230.post-88935612876303949812013-02-06T22:19:00.004-08:002013-04-16T15:00:12.586-07:00A Dirty Trick By Department of Justice Lawyer, Jason Levine. <table cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0" class="tr-caption-container" style="float: left;"><tbody>
<tr><td style="text-align: center;"><a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi67zgyELSvk4HoH2ptWioAoMaCc3-fczpEn7UsWL0UY_QEhzPC1pFiUHcWytf3JlkI5Xfvy0x8kdfvqJYgDAgsbqByri1BQzJ-Ih4IbaiQUZ4Le3tSVG7xSPxWMLZSVNbDa3TEHc9Mnhk/s1600/Judd%252520Levine-%25252018%255B1%255D.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;"><img border="0" height="212" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi67zgyELSvk4HoH2ptWioAoMaCc3-fczpEn7UsWL0UY_QEhzPC1pFiUHcWytf3JlkI5Xfvy0x8kdfvqJYgDAgsbqByri1BQzJ-Ih4IbaiQUZ4Le3tSVG7xSPxWMLZSVNbDa3TEHc9Mnhk/s320/Judd%252520Levine-%25252018%255B1%255D.jpg" width="320" /></a></td></tr>
<tr><td class="tr-caption" style="text-align: center;">Jason Levine shown on right </td></tr>
</tbody></table>
When <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> decided the <strong>Joself Rudolf</strong> was not paying taxes, it took the appropriate measures by sending him various notices requiring him to file a tax return and when he refused to file a tax return <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> assessed his income tax payable from other records it had on file. <br />
<br />
In the case of <strong>Josef Rudolf</strong>, it was very easy for <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> to assess <strong>Rudolf's</strong> gross income because<strong> Rudolf</strong> was dutifully and honestly collecting<strong> GST</strong> from his customers and remitting the required remittance forms and <strong>GST</strong> collected to the<strong> Canada Revenue Agency</strong>. <strong>GST </strong>is a general sales tax in<strong> Canada</strong> that was deviously foisted on the <strong>Canadian </strong>public by a corrupt <strong>Conservative</strong> government that was subsequently totally wiped out in the general election by the <strong>Liberal Party</strong> that lied its way into office by promising to remove the<strong> GST</strong>. The<strong> Liberals</strong> were elected but the tax remains proving that the real rulers of<strong> Canada</strong> are not the elected politicians but the unelected civil service who suck the life out of average citizens with blood thirsty taxation schemes that fund overly generous civil service pension schemes the nation cannot afford.<br />
<br />
With the help an accountant, it was an easy thing for<strong> Canada Revenue Agency</strong> to calculate the personal inciome of <strong>Mr. Rudolf</strong> by using his<strong> GST</strong> Returns anmd they sent<strong>Mr. Rudolf</strong> a bill for assessed taxes owing based on these calculations. They also added a hugely inflated accounting fee of approximately $70,000.00<br />
<br />
When <strong>Mr. Rudolf</strong> did not pay the amount assessed the <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> filed what is called a Certificate of Judgement against him in the <strong>Federal Court</strong>. A <strong>Certificate of Judgement</strong> is just like a court judgement except in this case there was not trial or hearing to determine if the bill for taxes was correct. This is how<strong> Canada</strong> operates. <strong> Court Orders</strong> in favour of the goverment are regularly made without any notice or a without a proper hearing. <br />
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Times New Roman","serif"; font-size: 12pt; line-height: 115%; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><br />
<span style="background: yellow; mso-highlight: yellow;"><span style="background-color: white;">Jozef Rudolf believes that
Canada has very good laws if not the best right from its foundations</span></span></span><br />
Nonetheless, so far, <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> was following their own draconian methods or <strong>Canada</strong> and treating <strong>Mr. Rudolf</strong> according to their usual oppressive procedures. <br />
<br />
When <strong>Mr. Rudolf</strong> learned of the <strong>Certificate of Judgment</strong> in the <strong>Federal Court</strong> he immediately filed papers to object to the amount claimed but instead of permitting him to proceed with his objections, the lawyers for the <strong>Department of Justice</strong> took the Certificate of Judgment in the <strong>Federal</strong> <strong>Court </strong>and filed it with the <strong>Supreme Court of British Columbia</strong> and, according to<strong> Rudolf</strong>,<strong> Department of Justice lawyer, Jason Levine</strong>, told him that henceforth all matters <u>must be dealt</u> with in the Supreme Court of British Columbia. <br />
<br />
<u><strong>In the Editors opinion this was a devious trick</strong></u> because the lawyer, <strong>Mr. Levine</strong>, knew and <strong>Mr. Rudolf</strong> did not know, that the <strong>Supreme Court of British Columbia</strong> had no jurisdiction to stay proceedings on the <strong>Certificate of Judgment</strong> while he and <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> sorted out the truth of amount of taxes claimed while the <strong>Federal Court</strong> did have such a jurisdiction. <br />
<br />
So,<strong> Jason Levine</strong>, a canny, devious, government lawyer with many years at the bar, finessed <strong>Mr. Rudolf</strong>, an ignorant citizen trying to protect his rights and property in accordaince with what he believed was the law. If that were the end of it, just aother government lawyer lying to a citizen who pays his salary, it might not be so unexpected because government lawyers in <strong>Canada</strong> have a reputation for lying cheating and other sorts of fraud. <br />
<br />
<strong><u>A Devious Plan Emerges:</u></strong><br />
<br />
However, based on subsequent events it does appear to the<strong> Editors</strong> that <strong>Jason Levine</strong> moved the case to the <strong>Supreme Court of British Columbia</strong> because he is a<strong> Freemason</strong> and he wanted to deliver <strong>Mr. Rudolf's</strong> property into the hands of the piratical <strong>Freemason</strong> cabal that operates, like a bank of thieves and highwaymen, inside the <strong>Supreme Court of British Columbia</strong> and, through devious manipulation, the property would be seized, sold and the proceeds distributed among the members of that <strong>Freemason</strong> cabal without any regard to the law, the taxpayers of<strong> Canada</strong> or <strong>Mr. Rudolf</strong>.<br />
<br />
The<strong> Editors</strong> make this assertion because, despite repeated requests made to <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong>, the court, the<strong> RCMP</strong>, and the <strong>Department of Justice</strong>, no one will provide and accounting of the funds realized from the sale of the proprety seized and, as far as anyone knows, the money has simply disappeared and cannot be accounted for leaving the<strong> Editors</strong> to conclude the money has been looted by employees, officers and agents of the Government who were involved in the process.<br />
<br />
At this time, we do not know if <strong>Jason Levine</strong> was a party to the foregoing thievery but we can advise the reader that according to staff at the <strong>Department of Justice, Jason Levine</strong>, suddenly went on a leave of absence in Januanry 2013 and will not be returning ot his position until at least June of 2013.<br />
<br />
There are two possibilities that immediately spring to mind:<br />
<br />
1. <strong>Mr. Levine</strong> has taken the leave of absence to avoid having to answer questions in reponse to Mr. Rudolf's inquiries.<br />
<br />
2. <strong>Mr. Levine</strong> has taken the money offshore so he can effectively hide it.<br />
<br />
We don't like to raise these suggestions of corruption about a lawyer working for the <strong>Canada's Department of Justice</strong> but, until someone provides a full accounting of the funds realized from the sale of <strong>Mr. Rudolf's</strong> property, the only reasonable inference is that someone stole the money and<strong> Jason Levine</strong> and other employees at <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> are prime suspects.Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11745256773069003209noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-191074327116151230.post-90000705675807918482013-02-06T00:29:00.001-08:002013-04-16T15:10:35.361-07:00Did Employees and Officers of Canada Revenue loot funds that should have been paid to the Canadian government for taxes owing? <div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;">
<a href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9PVQaQloOH9nZ1VY4bZo5ssq4npvUjsP7xhFTB8q2lKt-p7yUhQL45OsMENQLgwzoIgPJogxNF2SjlK2QX2Ta0EA1gkXPHe2AiOdsozklWM5OHmDK1GTyBer9Bgld8e-OFXqwZFlCBMg/s1600/Canada+Revenue+Agency2.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="240" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9PVQaQloOH9nZ1VY4bZo5ssq4npvUjsP7xhFTB8q2lKt-p7yUhQL45OsMENQLgwzoIgPJogxNF2SjlK2QX2Ta0EA1gkXPHe2AiOdsozklWM5OHmDK1GTyBer9Bgld8e-OFXqwZFlCBMg/s320/Canada+Revenue+Agency2.jpg" width="320" /></a></div>
Some people think <strong>Josef Rudolf</strong> deserved what he got from <strong>Canada Revenue Agency</strong> because he didn't pay his income taxes. <br />
<br />
Other people think that the post war <strong>Canadian </strong>income tax system is part of a grand scheme of international larceny set up, illegally and unconstitutionally in<strong> Canada,</strong> to support the <strong>International Monetary Fund</strong> and other international bankers with their schemes of world domination that have bankrupted several countries, nearly bankrupted <strong>Canada </strong>and are on the verge of bankrupting the <strong>United States of America</strong>. <br />
<br />
That debate is not what this blog is about.<br />
<br />
This blog is about injustice, the role of <strong>Freemasons</strong> in<strong> Canada's</strong> courts and the failure and refusal of employees, officers and agents of<strong> Canada Revenue Agency</strong> to account for the money they received when they allegedly sold the property they seized from<strong> Josef Rudolf</strong> to satisfy the debts he allegedly owed to <strong>Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada</strong> for arrears of income taxes.<br />
<br />
For several months, <strong>Josef Rudolf</strong> has been requesting the documentation, including accounting records and banking records that will show that the proceeds of the alleged sale of property held by him and seized by<strong> Canada Revenue Agency</strong> were properly credited to his alleged debt owing and deposited to a proper bank account owned and controlled by the <strong>Government of Canada</strong> but<strong> Canada</strong> <strong>Revenue Agency</strong> will not and has not produced those records and their persistent failure to do so raises the <strong><em>prima facie</em></strong> inference that the funds have been looted and mis-appropriated by officers, employees and agents of the <strong>Canada Revenue Agency.</strong><br />
<br />
And if they did that to money received from the sale of assets held by <strong>Joself Rudolf</strong> how much other money have they looted from other <strong>Canadians</strong>?<br />
<br />
The issue is extremely serious and it involves the whole structure of the legal administration of the <strong>Canadian Department of Justice,</strong> in <strong>Vancouver, Canada,</strong> where a group of employees are alleged to be members of a criminal organization carrying out operations under the guise of and utilizing the secret codes, handshakes and signals of<strong> Freemasonry</strong>. <br />
<br />
This is not an anti-<strong>Freemasonry</strong> blog and it is is hoped this blog will encourage right thinking <strong>British Columbian Freemasons</strong> and other <strong>Canadian Freemason</strong> organizations to update their rules and regulations so that <strong>Freemasons </strong>are free to report the corrupt actions of their brothers and sisters who are members of the judiciary and legal profession and who commit sedition and treason when they violate their<strong> Oaths of Office</strong>, as officers of the court, and their <strong>Oaths of Allegiance</strong> to the<strong> Queen</strong>, the <strong>Canadian Head of State</strong>, as they do every time they fix law cases to benefit brother and sister <strong>Freemasons</strong>.<br />
<br />
These suggested reforms to the Oaths of secrecy and mutual assistance of <strong>Freemasonry</strong> are long overdue. The <strong>Oaths of Freemasonry</strong> had a justifiable purpose when the <strong>Church</strong> and the <strong>Crown </strong>were a menace to society but, to paraphrase former <strong>Canadina Prime Minister,</strong> <strong>Pierre Trudeau</strong>, <em><strong>"The Church and Crown are not the menace they used to be", </strong></em>in a modern functioning democracy, like Canada, and <strong>Freemasonry</strong> is itself in danger of being declared an organized criminal gang that is not much different than <strong>Hell's Angels</strong> if <strong>Freemasons</strong> do not act soon to clean up the corruption in their ranks .<br />
<br />
A key player in this dirty business is a lawyer named <strong>Jason Lavine</strong> works for the <strong>Department of Justice</strong> and who refused to disclose whether or not he was a<strong> Freemason</strong> when asked by an investigative journalist. <br />
<br />
<strong>Jason Lavine</strong> showed up as legal counsel in 2010 and 211 to cover up for <strong>Provincial Court Judge</strong> <strong>Paul Meyers</strong> and former <strong>Canada revenue Agency Chief Collections Officer Richard Onley</strong> both of whom are accused of being<strong> Freemasons</strong> and both of whom refused to answer questions about whether or not they are <strong>Freemasons</strong>. So, it is safe to assume both are <strong>Freemason</strong>s. Both <strong> Meyers</strong> and<strong> Olney</strong> were accused of fixing a trial and illegally putting <strong>Eva Sydel</strong> in jail for 12 months and if the case against them is proved they are facing 14 years in jail, possibly more, because it is a far more serious offence for a judge to wrongfully convict someone than for someone not to pay income tax. <br />
<br />
<strong>Levine</strong> may go to jail with them. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.revenuecanada666.com/"><strong>Click here to read more about the case of Eva Sydel</strong></a> <br />
<br />
Recent investigations have revealed that <strong>Jason Levine</strong> is the son of two judges in <strong>Vancouver</strong>, namely, <strong>Justice Risa Levine,</strong> formerly of the <strong>Court of Appeal for British Columbia,</strong> and <strong>Justice Miriam Gropper</strong>, of the <strong>Supreme Court of British Columbia</strong>. Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11745256773069003209noreply@blogger.com1