Justice David Frankel, Freemasonry and the Department of Justice

Justice David Frankel

When Josef Rudolf encountered what appeared to be sharp practice and trickery by Vancouver Department of Justice lawyer, Jason Levine, he contacted friends in the vigilante movement in British Columbia who keep an eye on the corruption in the courts and who informed him that the Department of Justice in Vancouver was heavily infiltrated by Freemasons.

One of the suspected Freemasons is Justice David Frankel who was a career lawyer with the Department of Justice, in Vancouver, and who recently ruled against a litigant who applied for access to internal court documents that would prove a criminal conspiracy by several Vancouver based judges who are Freemasons.

Normally, court records are open to the public and secrecy is allowed to protect litigants or witnesses identity who need protection and not to protect the identity of judges who fix cases so it is probable that that Justice David Frankel was put on the case and broke his judicial oath in order to protect a group of judicial criminals and lawyers.

The vigilantes also informed Josef Rudolf that, according to various sources, there was a network of lawyers and judges in the Provincial Government operated criminal prosecution service and Federal Department of Justice that were heavy drug users (i.e. crack cocaine), involved in some very kinky sex and under the control of various criminal organizations that operate in the Vancouver criminal underworld. 

A few years ago, these vigilantes brought to public attention a number of cases where certain judges were involved in the criminal sex abuse of young children, as young as six,  and it is believed that at least one of the judges involved committed suicide instead of undergoing a criminal investigation.  

Click here to read about the pedofile judge whose career was terminated by the work of the British Columbia Vigilantes 

It was pointed out to Josef Rudolf that these lawyers and judges were completely owned by organized crime so he could not expect a fair hearing if a group of criminals was secretly profiting from the sale of his property a sale that Canada Revenue Agency refuses to provide any evidence of where the money went.

The fact that Canada Revenue Agency refuses to provide the evidence proves that the money did not go to the taxpayers of Canada and instead was paid out to criminals.

Mafia Infiltrates Canada Revenue Agency

The Canadian media is vindicating Josef Rudolf with new information that the Italian Mafia has infiltrated the Canada Revenue Agency in Montreal where dirty insiders Canada Revenue Agency mailed a $381,737 cheque to Mafia don Nicolo Rizzuto.

Click here for more on Mafia infiltration of CRA

However, the racist English language media in Canada is refusing to publish equally lurid stories about organized crime infiltration of the Canada Revenue Agency in the English speaking city of Vancouver where a Freemason based organized crime group has infiltrated the Department of Justice and refuses to account for the funds looted from Josef Rudolf.

Freemasonry in Canada is an international organized criminal syndicate headquartered in London England with links to dirty upper class families who looted the farms from English peasants.  English Freemasonry it is well known in English speaking countries to be involved in judicial, legal and police corruption as a result of years of unchecked infiltration of these government agencies.

Freemasonry in Canada should not be confused with American Freemasonry which is headquartered in the United States. Freemasonry in the United States played a historic role in the American Revolution against England while Freemasonry in Canada has subverted the independence of Canada, secretly, since the country was established as a self governing dominion within the British Empire in 1867.

Canada's first Prime Minister John MacDonald was a Freemason as were Robert Borden who introduced Income Tax during World War 1, Mackenzie King who illegally re-introduced Income Tax in Canada in 1948 and Brian Mulroney who illegally introduced the widely despised GST, Goods and Services Tax in 1992. 

Is Kirat Khalsa a dishonest lawyer? The Josef Rudolf case starts to get really nasty.

A Real Khalsa Doesn't Cheat 

Josef Rudolf is having a difficult time with Canada Revenue Agency lawyer Kirat Khalsa in Canada's Federal Court because Ms. Khalsa, in our opinion, has resorted to dirty tricks.

Dirty Tricks are sneaky, often dishonest, things that lawyers do so they can win a case in an underhanded and unfair way.  It is kind of like punching below the belt in boxing, tripping and hooking in hockey, and chemical weapons in warfare.  It is illegal but, if you get away with it, then you, as a lawyer, win your case but as a human being, you sell a piece of your soul and degrade yourself.

For example, lawyers will often write you a letter and not sign it.  This way they cannot be blamed for the dishonest words on the unsigned piece of paper that often mislead the recipient.  This is one of the dirty tricks that dishonest lawyers use.

In Josef Rudolf's case, Canada Revenue Agency was required to serve "Affidavits" in response to Josef Rudolf's initiating documents. Josef Rudolf, under the rules of court, was then entitled to cross-examine the person who swore the affidavit to be true.  Cross-examination of the "deponent" of an affidavit (i.e. the persons who swears it to be true) is an important part of the judicial process to ensure so that the parties are given the opportunity of a fair hearing.

However, in Josef Rudolf's case, Kirat Khalsa, as legal counsel for Canada Revenue Agency and other Respondents in Josef Rudolf's case, did not serve "sworn" Affidavits upon Josef Rudolf.  Instead she sent him an unsworn "Affidaivt" which is not really Affidavit at all but is simply a few pages of paper with words on them that cannot be attributed to anyone. In our opinion, by using this dirty trick, Kirat Khalsa craftily denied Josef Rudolf the opportunity to cross-examine the deponent of the Affidavit and, in the result, he was denied a fair hearing of his Petition in Canada's Federal Court.

Later, when the case went to court, Kirat Khalsa used the sworn Affidavit and Judge Simon Noel  let it be used in court over the objections of Josef Rudolf.  This was unfair also.

When Josef Rudolf appealed the decision of the lower court judge to Canada's Federal Court of Appeal, he objected to the inclusion of the sworn Affidavit in the Appeal Book because, in his opinion, it was not properly before the lower court and was not served upon him in the proper way thereby denying him a fair  hearing of his Petition.

Federal Court of  Appeal judge, Eleanor Dawson, ruled that the sworn Affidavit should be in the appeal book.

So, Josef Rudolf appealed the decision of judge Eleanor Dawson based on the fact that in his opinion, the Order of Eleanor Dawson had been obtained by fraud. 

Rule 399 (2) (b) states

On motion, the Court may set aside or vary an order

• (b) where the order was obtained by fraud.

This could get very nasty for Kirat Khalsa because, if the court finds she committed fraud, then she could, in theory, lose her licence to practise law.  We say "in theory" she could lose her licence because the professional body in British Columbia that supervises these kinds of things is the Law Society of British Columbia an organization riddled with corruption and with a notorious reputation for protecting government employed lawyers despite clear proof of their dishonesty.      


Josef Rudolf is claiming that Kirat Khalsa, (no photo available) a lawyer with Canada's Department of Justice in Vancouver, and William Pentney, (shown in photo on right) the Canadian Deputy Minister of Justice, in Ottawa, are both involved in this because William Pentney's name appears on the court documents and he establishes the legal culture in the Department of Justice.

If lawyers working for the Department of Justice cheat, use dirty tricks and get away with it, then William Pentney is not doing his job properly and he should be fired.